essay outline template examples
case study language teaching
personal statement samples resume
sample application letter voluntary work
lesson on cv writing
cover letter email cv
english essay room 101
essay topics antigone
critical analysis kite runner
literature review psychiatric nursing
personal statement graduate school library science
research paper sample discussion
creative writing prompt books
application letter customer service representative
critical thinking community wikipedia
how to write a paper on teaching philosophy
resume writing monster
cover letter with no addressee
writing descriptive essays person
nyu gallatin creative writing
sample architecture thesis proposal download
free resume writing information
5 paragraph essay sandwich
essay on respect of teachers in urdu
annotated bibliography reflection
essay kite runner book
writing an essay introduction for university
sample of cover letter with no name
action research paper guidelines
case study for presentation skills
the yellow wallpaper critical analysis essay
papers written on gun control
progress report sample for primary school
how to make an english paper outline
how to write a paper for college funny
career research paper mechanical engineering
application letter sample office assistant
thesis proposal front page
creative writing paper ideas
fourth grade essay ideas
creative writing mfa boston
resume writing graduation date
write cover letter for promotion
write a abridgment
church of critical thinking wiki
annotated bibliography kwantlen
coursework columbia university
annotated bibliography list apa
parts of an application letter for employment
accounting term paper
essay about highschool friends
difference between research paper and literature review
example personal statement pgce primary
get paid write essays online
latex documentclass cover letter
teaching esl students how to write a resume
critical thinking skills for elementary students
thesis proposal for literature
resume writing certified
200 words essay on corruption in india
essay samples esl students
an autobiography essay about yourself
ucla dentistry personal statement
annotated bibliography example mla pdf
sample essay question directions
sample essay topics
help writing resume objective
essay writing on importance of sports
nyu creative writing reviews
king lear tragedy essay questions
conspectus help me
sample key skills in cv
literature review systems biology
sociology essay topic ideas
persuasive essay examples about technology
ghostwriter rjd2 remix
case study on perfect competition market
cv personal profile sales assistant
essay topics for college entrance
best research papers site
cover letter magic book
template introduction essay
comparison and contrast essay topics for college
create a thesis statement for an essay
cv template word best
title personal statement for law school
financial statement analysis paper
hiring a professional business plan writer
english essay topics for year 12
writing prompts for elementary kids
sample resume general helper
essay outline template mla
sample essay grading rubric
uf 2012 essay prompt
best cover letter no experience
resume format for fresher lecturer in mathematics
abstract writing essay
News and Views
Paul Krugman, “Chinese New Year”Posted on January 4th, 2010 1 comment
Chinese New Year, New York Times
Published: December 31, 2009
It’s the season when pundits traditionally make predictions about the year ahead. Mine concerns international economics: I predict that 2010 will be the year of China. And not in a good way.
Actually, the biggest problems with China involve climate change. But today I want to focus on currency policy.
China has become a major financial and trade power. But it doesn’t act like other big economies. Instead, it follows a mercantilist policy, keeping its trade surplus artificially high. And in today’s depressed world, that policy is, to put it bluntly, predatory.
Here’s how it works: Unlike the dollar, the euro or the yen, whose values fluctuate freely, China’s currency is pegged by official policy at about 6.8 yuan to the dollar. At this exchange rate, Chinese manufacturing has a large cost advantage over its rivals, leading to huge trade surpluses.
Under normal circumstances, the inflow of dollars from those surpluses would push up the value of China’s currency, unless it was offset by private investors heading the other way. And private investors are trying to get into China, not out of it. But China’s government restricts capital inflows, even as it buys up dollars and parks them abroad, adding to a $2 trillion-plus hoard of foreign exchange reserves.
This policy is good for China’s export-oriented state-industrial complex, not so good for Chinese consumers. But what about the rest of us?
In the past, China’s accumulation of foreign reserves, many of which were invested in American bonds, was arguably doing us a favor by keeping interest rates low — although what we did with those low interest rates was mainly to inflate a housing bubble. But right now the world is awash in cheap money, looking for someplace to go. Short-term interest rates are close to zero; long-term interest rates are higher, but only because investors expect the zero-rate policy to end some day. China’s bond purchases make little or no difference.
Meanwhile, that trade surplus drains much-needed demand away from a depressed world economy. My back-of-the-envelope calculations suggest that for the next couple of years Chinese mercantilism may end up reducing U.S. employment by around 1.4 million jobs.
The Chinese refuse to acknowledge the problem. Recently Wen Jiabao, the prime minister, dismissed foreign complaints: “On one hand, you are asking for the yuan to appreciate, and on the other hand, you are taking all kinds of protectionist measures.” Indeed: other countries are taking (modest) protectionist measures precisely because China refuses to let its currency rise. And more such measures are entirely appropriate.
Or are they? I usually hear two reasons for not confronting China over its policies. Neither holds water.
First, there’s the claim that we can’t confront the Chinese because they would wreak havoc with the U.S. economy by dumping their hoard of dollars. This is all wrong, and not just because in so doing the Chinese would inflict large losses on themselves. The larger point is that the same forces that make Chinese mercantilism so damaging right now also mean that China has little or no financial leverage.
Again, right now the world is awash in cheap money. So if China were to start selling dollars, there’s no reason to think it would significantly raise U.S. interest rates. It would probably weaken the dollar against other currencies — but that would be good, not bad, for U.S. competitiveness and employment. So if the Chinese do dump dollars, we should send them a thank-you note.
Second, there’s the claim that protectionism is always a bad thing, in any circumstances. If that’s what you believe, however, you learned Econ 101 from the wrong people — because when unemployment is high and the government can’t restore full employment, the usual rules don’t apply.
Let me quote from a classic paper by the late Paul Samuelson, who more or less created modern economics: “With employment less than full … all the debunked mercantilistic arguments” — that is, claims that nations who subsidize their exports effectively steal jobs from other countries — “turn out to be valid.” He then went on to argue that persistently misaligned exchange rates create “genuine problems for free-trade apologetics.” The best answer to these problems is getting exchange rates back to where they ought to be. But that’s exactly what China is refusing to let happen.
The bottom line is that Chinese mercantilism is a growing problem, and the victims of that mercantilism have little to lose from a trade confrontation. So I’d urge China’s government to reconsider its stubbornness. Otherwise, the very mild protectionism it’s currently complaining about will be the start of something much bigger.
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/01/opinion/01krugman.html?th&emc=thChina, Global Economic Imbalance, Mercantilism China, Economic imbalance, Exchange Rates, Mercantilism, Protectionism, Renminbi, US Economy
Leave a reply